Self-discovery through parenting. And cookies.

Posted on

Well, I’d still love to have an awesome, regularly-updated website. That endeavour is sitting on a back burner, as our time and energy are all earmarked for other stuff for a while.

In my mind I have an enormous stovetop with quite a lot of burners, especially at the back.

In keeping with the cooking theme so neatly thus established, earlier this week I made and decorated some cookies with G. She’s now old enough to actually work against entropy for appreciable periods, meaning that a mess is no longer her sole contribution to an activity. With some help, she rolled dough, cut shapes, and arranged cookies on the sheet. After supper, she decorated her cookies and I decorated some I’d made earlier.

Yesterday morning I let G choose one of her cookies to take with her. She changed her mind on the way out the gate and wanted a circle-shaped one instead of a trapezoid. F ducked inside and came out with a circle – one that I’d made. I remarked that I’d hoped he’d bring one she’d decorated herself.

F replied (becoming quieter near the end of the sentence) that he’d thought that was one of the ones she’d decorated.

I inspected the remaining cookies once they’d left (after taking a couple of bites of one for sustenance).

Sugar cookies on a plate on the ground.

It’s pretty obvious which ones are the three-year-old’s, no?

What do you mean, no?

Well, I helped her with the diamond at 12 o’clock. And OK, the one at two o’clock is ambiguous, as is the partially-consumed one at 7 o’clock. However, I invite the reader to inspect more closely and to discover that one of the two is iced on the front side, while the other is iced on the back. And now it dawns upon me that in that, I have pinpointed the exact border* between the skill and care I apply to cookie-decorating and the skill and care applied by my three-year-old child.

We were both more interested in eating the icing than applying it in elaborate patterns. The main difference was that in my maturity, I wanted to eat the icing on the cookies.

I had expected a stronger innate difference in our sense of order, or in our manual dexterity, than was actually manifested. But the motivation showed through in the product, for both of us. I’m simultaneously a little ashamed that I’d publicly post a photo of cookies that I made that look as though they were decorated by a preschooler, and proud that G and I are beginning to have more things in common.

The cookies were delicious. I used this recipe for sugar cookies, and included the almond extract. The recipe doesn’t use baking soda or baking powder, which is a plus for me, and it’s not overwhelmingly sweet like the previous recipe I tried. I didn’t refrigerate, because I didn’t care much about keeping the shape (hey, if you’re going to do it half-assed, do it half-assed all the way, that’s apparently my motto).

*Nerdy aside: do I savour the clash of zero- and one-dimensional metaphors, or rewrite to resolve the awkwardness? Time constraints. Savour it is.

These are the people in my internet*: Enrico Casarosa

Posted on

Related to some thinking I’ve been doing about the ways in which I have used, and do use, the internet, and also related to the fact that the 2012 Oscar ceremony took place last night…

I don’t care much about the Oscars (hey, cynicism and also a complete lack of opportunities to watch movies in the past year), but I did happen to have an arbitrary bias toward the Pixar short La Luna (which I haven’t seen) in the best animated short film category.  Not due to any sort of clairvoyant knowledge about the relative strengths of the competitors in that category, but just because it was directed by one Enrico Casarosa.

In the early-to-mid ’00s, Casarosa was an active member of the Flight forums, a very active (but currently eerily quiet, following publication of the eighth and final volume of Flight anthologies) community of comics creators (with dabblers like me at the periphery). He coordinated the First World Wide SketchCrawl drawing marathon in November 2004. People in different countries spent the day out drawing, alone or in groups, and shared results on the SketchCrawl forum. I joined in, in my solitary way, heading into Cambridge with sketchpad, pencils, water brush, and pocket watercolour set in my MEC carry-all bag.

Here’s me in November 2004, about to come down with the flu:

(I notice those are the shoes I wore today.)

I sketched for a few hours. A lot of my watercolours were blotted off the sketches by rain-soaked opposite pages in the sketchbook.

I did that one inside Starbucks. So the paint stayed on.

That night I uploaded my work to share and perused what others had created. Then, having spent the day standing around in the cold and wet, I succumbed to a miserable flu and have never felt up to joining a SketchCrawl event again. However, I have always admired Casarosa’s leadership in setting up a framework and inspiring people to take part. The 34th World Wide SketchCrawl took place in January this year.

Fast-forward to the past year. Casarosa blogged a day-in-the-life series of posts on the process of making La Luna, and he gave a peek at the experience of being nominated for an Oscar on Twitter (@sketchcrawl). His tweets share some of the magic of his work (including “bloopers,” or incorrectly-rendered images from the computer-animated film), the wonder of being a dad, and an all-around happy attitude that I resonate to. It doesn’t hurt that he makes a point of enjoying his commute on a nice Bianchi bicycle, complete with old-school toe clips.

(I think I coloured this one on the computer. There was a ceremony for turning on the Christmas lights in Cambridge that evening.)

As it turns out, La Luna didn’t win the Oscar, but it’s one short film I’ll make a point of seeing.

*Yes, this is a reference to this.

Freak summer weather

Posted on

Here’s what it looked like a couple of weeks ago:

Cool, misty, snowed-upon and sheep-infested. Actually, the sheep are still there. And I have nothing against them. I was just reaching for adjectives. Actually, they are quite smelly. But I can deal with it.

This man was throwing snowballs for his dog to chase. Sort of. He wasn’t that great at making snowballs.

Fast-forward to today:

OK, so you can’t really tell the temperature from this pic. You’ll have to trust me (or just check a more trustworthy internet source). It was warm. I swear that tree is thinking hard about generating some buds.

The sky was a brilliant blue that’s rare enough even in summer to catch my attention. Usually by 10am on any given day there’s at least a saturation-sucking haze and some solid clouds.

I haven’t seen colours this brilliant in months. It was in the mid-teens Celsius. If this was Canada (except Vancouver) everyone would be going delirious and going out in shorts and T-shirts. In Vancouver half of them have been wearing their shorts all winter but they might be squinting a bit at the sunlight. Any minute now all the plum trees are going to explode like popcorn into fluffy blossom-festooned things.

I seem to have been a bit myopic in my selection of photographic subjects today. It is still February and we are well into the northern hemisphere, so the sun is still slanty and despite the absence of snow, the real difference, aside from details, is difficult to capture on camera.

It’s supposed to cool off again now. That’s OK. We got away with something today.